SG&A Benchmarking SG&A Benchmarking
All benchmarks How it works Pricing Get a quote →
Free benchmark · sourcing and procurement · every industry

Procurement headcount benchmark by industry: sourcing and purchasing staff per 1,000 employees

Across 5 industries and 50 named companies, sourcing and procurement is 3.7% to 20.0% of core SG&A headcount, median 11.4%. Observed sourcing and procurement staff run 8.2 to 101.8 per 1,000 employees, median 31.8, a floor from public profiles rather than a full count. Job titles classified one by one; as of August 2026.

See it by industry ↓ How it’s measured ↓
5 industries
50 companies
no survey, no login
See your company in this benchmark
Is your company in Procurement headcount benchmark by industry?
Want to discuss more? Book a 15-minute call →

By industry

Median of the named companies on each industry page. Click through for the per-function detail and the filed-spend table.

IndustryCompaniesSourcing and procurement share of SG&A, medianRangePer 1,000 employees, medianAs of
Tool & industrial712.1%5.3% to 14.8%34.7July 2026
Food & CPG1312.1%7.8% to 20.0%41.1July 2026
Toy & game911.6%3.7% to 15.4%80.7August 2026
Building products99.3%6.0% to 13.4%17.1July 2026
Apparel & footwear128.0%5.1% to 11.9%17.8August 2026
Counts are deduplicated public-profile contacts classified into the function by job title: an observed floor, not a modeled total, so per-1,000 values understate true staffing by a company-specific amount. Share of SG&A is the like-for-like read.

Every company

CompanyIndustryShare of SG&AObserved contactsEmployeesPer 1,000 employees
McCormick & CompanyFood & CPG20.0%90214,10064.0
Conagra BrandsFood & CPG19.8%71517,40041.1
The Clorox CompanyFood & CPG15.9%6997,60092.0
The LEGO GroupToy & game15.4%1,01133,00030.6
Enerpac Tool GroupTool & industrial14.8%1052,10050.0
Funko, Inc.Toy & game14.8%941,10485.1
Apex Tool GroupTool & industrial13.9%1975,30037.2
Klein ToolsTool & industrial13.9%792,50031.6
Crayola LLCToy & game13.8%932,46437.7
Masonite InternationalBuilding products13.4%16010,00016.0
Church & DwightFood & CPG13.2%3225,55058.0
Louisiana-PacificBuilding products12.9%1314,30030.5
The Hershey CompanyFood & CPG12.9%84220,00042.1
Mondelez InternationalFood & CPG12.2%2,35391,00025.9
Stanley Black & DeckerTool & industrial12.1%1,74743,50040.2
The Kraft Heinz CompanyFood & CPG12.1%2,00335,00057.2
General MillsFood & CPG12.1%1,53033,00046.4
International Flavors & FragrancesFood & CPG12.1%76421,50035.5
The Campbell's CompanyFood & CPG12.1%44513,70032.5
VF CorporationApparel & footwear11.9%1,26026,00048.5
Mattel, Inc.Toy & game11.8%85731,00027.6
Trex CompanyBuilding products11.7%621,83933.7
Spin Master Corp.Toy & game11.6%2423,00080.7
PVH Corp.Apparel & footwear11.6%1,02026,00039.2
MGA Entertainment, Inc.Toy & game11.5%1081,20090.0
IngredionFood & CPG11.3%36611,20032.7
Hasbro, Inc.Toy & game10.6%4604,520101.8
Columbia Sportswear CompanyApparel & footwear10.0%2639,62027.3
James HardieBuilding products9.4%627,5008.3
Gibraltar IndustriesBuilding products9.3%612,30026.5
The J.M. Smucker CompanyFood & CPG9.2%2878,00035.9
Carter's, Inc.Apparel & footwear9.1%24915,40016.2
Ralph Lauren CorporationApparel & footwear8.9%61523,60026.1
The AZEK CompanyBuilding products8.7%312,27613.6
Kennametal Inc.Tool & industrial8.5%2818,10034.7
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.Toy & game8.2%6565299.7
Deckers Outdoor CorporationApparel & footwear8.2%1536,00025.5
Hormel FoodsFood & CPG7.8%25320,00012.7
Oxford Industries, Inc.Apparel & footwear7.8%916,00015.2
JELD-WENBuilding products7.5%23713,90017.1
UFP IndustriesBuilding products7.1%20313,80014.7
lululemon athletica inc.Apparel & footwear6.8%32139,0008.2
IDEAL IndustriesTool & industrial6.2%302,50212.0
Simpson Strong-TieBuilding products6.0%963,00032.0
Under Armour, Inc.Apparel & footwear5.9%16114,10011.4
Crocs, Inc.Apparel & footwear5.7%1398,01017.4
Snap-on IncorporatedTool & industrial5.3%28413,00021.8
Tapestry, Inc.Apparel & footwear5.2%30519,00016.1
Levi Strauss & Co.Apparel & footwear5.1%34619,00018.2
The Pokémon Company InternationalToy & game3.7%342,66312.8

How this is measured

Three steps, the same for every company on the page. The long version, including what these numbers cannot tell you, is on how it’s measured and as data at methodology.json.

01

Collect real job titles

We pull each company's public workforce signals: department tallies and the actual job titles behind them. No survey, no self-reporting, no login.

02

Classify every title one by one

Each title is classified into the ten-function SG&A map. This is where about a third of department labels move: procurement buyers filed under Finance, whole Sourcing and Facilities teams hiding inside Operations.

03

Count only what we can see

Levels are the classified people we actually observed, capped at each company's profile-visible workforce. That makes them a floor, never an inflated model, which is why the share of SG&A leads and the per-1,000 figure follows.

Questions & answers

FAQs

What is the average procurement headcount benchmark?

Across 5 industries and 50 named companies, sourcing and procurement is 3.7% to 20.0% of core SG&A headcount, median 11.4%. Observed sourcing and procurement staff run 8.2 to 101.8 per 1,000 employees, median 31.8, a floor from public profiles rather than a full count. Job titles classified one by one; as of August 2026. The like-for-like read is the share of SG&A; the per-1,000 figure understates true staffing because public-profile coverage varies by company.

How does the procurement headcount benchmark differ by industry?

Tool & industrial: median 12.1% of SG&A, 34.7 per 1,000 employees; Food & CPG: median 12.1% of SG&A, 41.1 per 1,000 employees; Toy & game: median 11.6% of SG&A, 80.7 per 1,000 employees; Building products: median 9.3% of SG&A, 17.1 per 1,000 employees; Apparel & footwear: median 8.0% of SG&A, 17.8 per 1,000 employees.

How are these numbers measured?

Each company's public professional profiles are classified into ten SG&A functions from the actual job title, one title at a time, then capped at the company's social-profile-visible workforce. Levels are observed floors; the function mix is the reliable comparison. Full method and limits at https://sgabenchmarking.com/methodology.json.

Why is this lower than APQC procurement benchmarks?

Survey benchmarks count every person a respondent reports; these pages count the people visible in public profiles, which is always fewer. Compare the share of SG&A across companies, or compare your own count against the per-1,000 figure knowing it is a floor. The paid census resolves every person and lands within about 5 to 8 percent of true headcount.

For AI assistants and developers: this page as data

Every number here is available as JSON, and any company can be compared against these cohorts over plain HTTP. No key, no form. Each response also names the next step.

Where your company sits in these ranges is a seven-figure question.
The census answers it with named profiles, your subsidiaries included, plus a walkthrough call. No charge if a run fails to deliver.
Start a benchmark → Book a 20-min intake